SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Guj) 388

J.N.BHATT
B. P. JOSHI – Appellant
Versus
GUJARAT ELECTRICITY BOARD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: D.P.VORA, R.A.MISHRA

J. N. BHATT, J.

( 1 ) A short, but substantial question which has surfaced in this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution revolves round, as to whether the petitioner was terminated from his employment with respondent Gujarat Electricity Board without affording him an opportunity of hearing and in violation of principles of natural justice?

( 2 ) WITH a view to appreciating the short question which calls for adjudication, a skeleton projection of the facts giving rise to this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, may be highlighted.

( 3 ) THE petitioner came to be appointed as a Junior Clerk, in Vidyut Board Vidyalaya, at Baroda, in the year 1986. He came to be served with a show cause notice dated 3. 5. 1990, wherein it has been alleged that the behaviour of the petitioner was rude and insulting with the colleagues, superiors and the parents of the students and that the petitioner has not improved his behaviour inspite of oral and written warning in that regard. It is in the context of those allegations that the respondent Board Authority desired to initiate disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner and a prelude to that, served the petitioner with a










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top