SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Guj) 456

J.N.BHATT, A.L.DAVE
LOK ADHIKAR SANGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.J.YAGNIK, D.N.Patel, HARSHA N.DEVANI

J. N. BHATT, J.

( 1 ) RULE, service of which is waived by learned a. G. P. Ms. Harsha Devani for respondent Nos. 1 to 4 whereas, learned Senior standing Counsel Mr. D. N. Patel waives service for respondent No. 5.

( 2 ) THE petitioner, by invocation of provisions of Art. 226 of the Constitution of India, has sought direction from this Court that respondent No. 1 be directed to frame rules under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 and bring them into operation, as expeditiously as possible.

( 3 ) THE Juvenile Justice Act, 1986 (LIII of 1986) is designed and provided for the care, protection, treatment, development and rehabilitation of neglected or delinquent juveniles. It also provides the mechanism for adjudication of certain matters relating to and disposition of delinquent juveniles. It cannot be gainsaid that the legislative mechanism and statutory provisions in the Act as well as subsequently in the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 unambiguously indicate that much greater attention and welfare measures are required to be taken for the children who are found in situations of social maladjustment, neglected or delinquency.










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top