SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Guj) 434

D.P.BUCH
JASHUBHAI DHANABHAI BARAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: CHETAN K.PANDYA, S.V.RAJU, V.M.PANCHOLI, YOGESH S.LAKHANI

D. P. BUCH, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner herein has preferred this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, the Code) for appropriate writ, order or direction for quashing and setting aside the decision taken by the State Government directing reinvestigation of the criminal complaint instituted by the third respondent being CR. I-45/2002 registered before Prabhas Patan police station in Veraval Taluka of Junagadh District in respect of offences said to have been committed at 14. 30 hours on 18. 3. 2002, punishable under sections 307, 326, 34 and 114 of IPC as well as under section 25 of the Arms Act and section 135 of the Bombay Police Act, 1951. The aforesaid FIR was filed on 18. 3. 2003 by one Jasabhai Lakhabhai Koli of Gorakhmadhi against two unknown persons for the aforesaid offences. During the course of investigation, names of the accused persons were disclosed and accordingly they were arrested. They were charge-sheeted before the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class at Veraval and since the offence in question was exclusively triable by a Court of Sessions, the case was committed to the Co





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top