SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Guj) 475

J.N.PATEL
NAYANKUMAR RAJNIKABEN TRIVEDI – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER, ANAND – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.D.OZA, DESAI AND CO., E.E.SAIYED

J. N. PATEL, J.

( 1 ) LEAVE to delete respondent no. 2. Accordingly the name of respondent no. 2 stands deleted.

( 2 ) RULE. Mr. Desai waives service of notice of rule on behalf of respondent no. 1 and Mr. A. D. Oza, learned GP waives service of notice of rule on behalf of respondent no. 2. With the consent of the respective parties, the matter is taken up for final hearing today.

( 3 ) THE only question involved in this petition is whether the petitioner should be allowed to assert his right as per the Adoption Deed dated 7th April 2000 or not.

( 4 ) THE short facts of the case is that the mother of the petitioner got married with one Shri Rafiuddin Kazi and after the birth of the petitioner the custody of the petitioner was delivered to one Ms. Rajnikaben Trivedi. The petitioner was formerly known as Kazi Moinoddin Rafiyuddin and it is the case of the petitioner that since the petitioner has embraced Hindu religion on account of his care being taken by Rajnikaben, the petitioner has adopted the name of Nayankumar and wants himself to be identified as Trivedi Nayankumar Rajnikaben. The petitioner was adopted by registered Adoption Deed dated 7th April 2000 and it is the case of the









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top