SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Guj) 586

K.A.PUJ
JUNAGADH MUNICIPALITY – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: HRIDAY BUCH, KAMAL B.TRIVEDI, N.D.NANAVATI

K. A. PUJ, J.

( 1 ) THE present petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the action of the State Government to constitute Junagadh Municipal Corporation before the tenure/duration of the petitioner No. 1 Municipality is over and that too, without dissolving the Municipality and without giving a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the petitioner No. 1 Municipality. During the pendency of this petition, the petitioner has also moved draft amendment whereby the petitioner has prayed for quashing and setting aside the Notification No. KV-125/02/mna/1001-CMR-41 (i)P dtd. 13. 09. 2002 constituting the Municipal Corporation for the city of Junagadh and appointing the Collector as an Administrator of the Municipal Corporation.

( 2 ) THE petitioner has further prayed for quashing and setting aside the Notification dtd. 16. 12. 2002 whereby the Administrator was directed to exercise all the powers and perform all the functions and duties of the authorities referred to in Items (i) to (iv) of Sub-paragraph (a) of Paragraph 22 in Part IV of Appendix IV to the B. P. M. C. Act during and from the period of his appointment i. e. 15. 09. 2002 as Administrator an




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top