SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Guj) 579

P.B.MAJMUDAR
MUKESHKUMAR PREMSHANKER JOSHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: I.M.PANDYA, I.S.SUPEHIA

P. B. MAJMUDAR, J.

( 1 ) RULE. With the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for final hearing today.

( 2 ) IT is unfortunate that the petitioner is required to knock the doors of this Court even though he was required to be reinstated in service in view of the acquittal order passed in his favour.

( 3 ) THE petitioner is serving as a primary teacher at Velavadar Primary School and, at present, he is under suspension. By order dated 18th October, 1997, he was placed under suspension by the order of the District Primary Education Officer. The petitioner was suspended in view of the criminal case which was pending against him under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. It is not in dispute that in view of the pendency of the said Criminal Case, the petitioner was placed under suspension. It is not in dispute that the petitioner was acquitted under Section 235 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The operative part of the said order is also produced by the petitioner at page 6 of the compilation, at Annexure b. After his acquittal, he is not subjected to any departmental proceedings in any manner and he continued in suspension only in view of the aforeaid criminal case. The








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top