SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Guj) 639

D.H.WAGHELA
MANOJKUMAR HARILAL JOSHI – Appellant
Versus
TRUPTIBEN MANOJKUMAR JOSHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: H.L.JANI, PRAVIN GONDALIYA, SHAKIL A.QURESHI

D. H. WAGHELA, J.

( 1 ) THIS Criminal Revision Application seeks to challenge the order of the learned Sessions Judge in Criminal Revision Application no. 159/2002, whereby the order to pay interim maintenance to the respondent no. 1 and 2 was revised to Rs. 5000. 00 and Rs. 1500. 00 from Rs. 500. 00 and Rs. 400. 00 respectively.

( 2 ) ADMITTEDLY, the original application for maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code was filed with the contentions that the petitioner was a Professor employed at a salary of Rs. 21,000. 00, besides having the income from singing of songs and giving stage programmes. The original applicants, being wife aged 38 and minor son aged 12, have claimed total Rs. 12,000. 00 per month by way of maintenance and also prayed to decide the amount of interim maintenance, since the hearing and disposal of the main application might take longer time. The applicants had substantiated their contentions by executing an affidavit dated 12-9-2002 below the application and, after considering that, the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rajkot, had, by order dated 10-12-2002, ordered the payment of total Rs. 900. 00 by way of interim maintenance.

( 3 ) AGG











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top