R.P.DHOLAKIA
NADIRKHAN BABAKHAN NAVABKHAN PATHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
( 1 ) RULE. Learned A. P. P. , Mrs. Hansa Punani, waives service of rule on behalf of the respondent-State in both the petitions. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the respective parties, both these petitions are taken up for final hearing.
( 2 ) BOTH these petitions have been filed under Sec. 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for quashing and setting aside the First Information Reports being C. R. No. II-3187 of 2002 lodged with the Danilimda Police Station and C. R. No. I-530 of 2002 lodged with Naroda Police Station and for deleting the name of the petitioner from the respective charge-sheets showing him as an absconding accused mainly on the ground that the only evidence available with the investigating agency is the statement of co-accused and also on the ground that the present petitioner is a social worker who has organized relief camp under the banner of Hajarat Shah-e-Alam Relief Camp at Ahmedabad and who has made grievance against the administration before various authorities and, therefore, mala fidely he has been involved in the offences in question.
( 3 ) AN affidavit-in-reply has been filed by the Investigating Officer, Mr. K. R.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.