SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2003 Supreme(Guj) 684

P.B.MAJMUDAR
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER – Appellant
Versus
ASHOKBHAI J. DESAI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: PUSHPADATTA VYAS, SEJAL K.MANDAVIA

P. B. MAJMUDAR, J.

( 1 ) 1. BY filing this petition, which is in the nature of Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the order passed by the Presiding Judge, Labour Court, Nadiad in Reference (LCN) No. 155 of 1992.

( 2 ) THE respondent-workman had raised an industrial dispute, challenging the decision of the petitioner-Management in not continuing him in service as a daily rated driver. The dispute was referred to the Labour Court, Nadiad and it was numbered as Reference (LCN) No. 155 of 1992. The respondent was appointed as a daily rated driver from 1. 11. 1989. It is his case that he was serving sincerely and satisfactorily, on a daily wage of Rs. 37. 60, and that he had served continuously upto 1. 5. 1991, i. e. the date on which he was relieved from services. According to him, his services were illegally terminated with effect from 1. 5. 1991 and he was told that his services were no longer required. It is also his case that after terminating his services, the petitioner-Department appointed someone else in the aforesaid post of Driver. Under the circumstances, a demand was raised by the concerned workman to the effect that he may be reinstated
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top