SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Guj) 16

J.M.PANCHAL, M.H.KADRI
LAXMAN BAPU SONAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: B.D.DESAI, BANNA S.DUTTA

J. M. PANCHAL, J.

( 1 ) BOTH the appeals filed under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, are directed against common judgment dated March 16, 1999, rendered by the learned Additional City Sessions Judge, Court No. 18, Ahmedabad, in Sessions Case No. 56 of 1998 and Sessions Case No. 57 of 1998, by which, the appellants are convicted of the offence punishable under Section 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (ndps Act for short) as well as of the offence punishable under Section 379 read with 114 of the Indian Penal Code, and sentenced to suffer R. I. for ten years and fine of Rs. 1 lakh, in default, S. I. for six months for commission of offence punishable under Section 22 of the NDPS Act, as well as R. I. for three years and fine of Rs. 3000, in default, S. I. for one month for commission of offences punishable under Section 379 read with 114 of the Indian Penal Code. It may be stated that the learned Additional City Sessions Judge has directed that substantial sentences imposed on the appellants shall run concurrently.

( 2 ) AS both the Sessions Cases were tried at one trial and disposed of by common judgment dated March 16, 1999, th






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top