SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Guj) 67

J.N.BHATT, K.A.PUJ
CHEMBOND CHEMICALS LTD. – Appellant
Versus
INDIAN OIL CORPORATION – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: ASIM PANDYA, MANISH R.BHATT, S.B.VAKIL

K. A. PUJ, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for quashing and setting aside of the impugned decision dated 06. 01. 2004 of the respondent Corporation i. e. Indian Oil Corporation Limited, being unjust, illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19 (1) (g) and 21 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner has also prayed for direction to the respondent Corporation to consider the tender of the petitioner Company before finalisation of the contract with any other party and if the offer of the petitioner Company is found to be the lowest, to accept the same. The petitioner has also prayed for interim relief seeking stay against the execution, implementation and operation of the impugned decision dated 06. 01. 2004 and against further process of finalisation of the contract in respect of the treatment of the water cooling tower.

( 2 ) THE factual profile emerging from the petition is that the respondent Corporation published notice inviting Tenders for their various requirements on 06. 11. 2003 and one of the items for which the offers were invited was chemical treatment of cooling water for a period of two yea


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top