R.P.DHOLAKIA
JAYESHBHAI @ PANCHABHAI MULJIBHAI SATODIYA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent
( 1 ) RULE. Mr. P. R. Abichandani, learned APP for the opponent No. 1 of Cri. Rev. Appln. No. 92 of 2004, Mr. K. J. Shethna, learned Senior Counsel for the opponent No. 2 of Cri. Rev. Appln. No. 92 of 2004 and opponent No. 1 of Cri. Rev. Appln. No. 102 of 2004, Mr. N. D. Nanavati, learned Senior Counsel for opponent No. 3 of Cri. Rev. Appln. No. 92 of 2004 and opponent No. 2 of Cri. Rev. Appln. No. 102 of 2004, Mr. R. R. Trivedi, learned counsel for the opponent No. 4 of Cri. Rev. Appln. No. 92 of 2004 and opponent No. 3 of Cri. Rev. Appln. No. 102 of 2004 respectively waive service of notice of rule.
( 2 ) CRIMINAL Revision Application No. 92 of 2004 has been filed by the original complainant-Jayeshbhai Panchabhai Muljibhai Satodiya while Criminal Revision Application No. 102 of 2004 has been filed by the State of Gujarat under Sec. 397 read with Sec. 401 and also read with Sec. 439 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the judgment and order dated 17-2-2004 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge, Gondal, in Criminal Misc. Application No. 28 of 2004 whereby opponent Nos. 2 to 4 of Cri. Rev. Appln. No. 92 of 2004 who are o
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.