( 1 ) HEARD Mr. S. V. Raju learned counsel with Mr. Chetan Pandya learned counsel on behalf of the petitioner, Ms. Nandini Joshi learned APP for the respondent State and Mr. Zubin Bharda for respondent no. 2 in Cri. Revision Application No. 479 of 2002.

( 2 ) PRESENT Criminal Revision Application No. 479 of 2002 is preferred to get the order set aside passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Surat dated 16. 11. 2002 while disposing of the Criminal Revision Application No. 284 of 2002.

( 3 ) THE order under challenge is a common order passed while dealing with two Criminal Revision Applications viz. Criminal Revision Application No. 240 of 2002 and 284 of 2002.

( 4 ) CRIMINAL Revision Application No. 240 of 2002 was filed by the present petitioner and the second one by respondent no. 2 of the present Revision Application viz. Navinchandra Dhirajlal Gandhi.

( 5 ) TODAY, the two matters are listed for final hearing as different proceedings. One of them is, a Special Criminal Application No. 865 of 2002 invoking jurisdiction of this court under section 482 of the Cri. Proc. Code. It is submitted that the Criminal Revision Application preferred by the petitioner ca