SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Guj) 126

H.K.RATHOD
HINDUSTAN SALTS LTD – Appellant
Versus
NOORADRAJ M. PATHAN – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: PRANAV G.DESAI, SHAILESH C.PARIKH

H. K. RATHOD, J.

( 1 ) HEARD learned advocate Mr. Pranav G. Desai on behalf of the petitioner and learned advocate Mr. Shailesh Parikh for respondent - workman. Today, this Court has allowed Misc. Civil Application No. 293 / 2004 in SCA No. 1163 / 1995 restoring this petition to its original file with all reliefs attached to the file and thereafter, with the consent of the learned advocates for the respective parties, this Court is inclined to hear and dispose of the present petition by this judgment and order.

( 2 ) THE petitioner - Hindustan Salts Ltd. has challenged the order passed by the Labour Court, Surendranagar vide Exh. 10 in Reference No. 14 / 1991 dated 8th January, 1995, whereby the labour court, Surendranagar came to the conclusion that the departmental inquiry conducted against the workman is contrary to the principles of natural justice and vitiated. This Court, initially, issued Rule on 24th February, 1995 and by interim order stayed order of the order in question vide Exh. 10 passed by the labour court, Surendranagar till further order. It is relevant to observe that the order passed by this Court is an exparte order. Affidavit-in-reply is filed by the respondent.
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top