SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Guj) 212

M.R.SHAH
GOVINDJI CHHABAJI – Appellant
Versus
PRANT OFFICER – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: J.K.PARMAR, L.R.PUJARI, SUDHA R.GANGWAR

M. R. SHAH, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioners, who are owners of block No. 431 situated at Village Kujad, Taluka Dascroi, have preferred the present Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the judgment and order dated 22. 9. 1993 passed by the learned Special Secretary (Appeals), Revenue Department, State of Gujarat, dismissing Revision Application and confirming the judgment and order passed by the Collector, Ahmedabad, dated 30th December 1988 by which the Collector, Ahmedabad, has confirmed the judgment and order passed by the Deputy Collector, Viramgam dated 20th August 1988 in cancelling the Entry No. 1729.

( 2 ) THE petitioners had purchased the land bearing block No. 431 situated in Village Kujad, Taluka-Dascroi by registered Sale Deed from the respondent No. 4 herein and names of the petitioners were entered into the Record of Rights vide Entry No. 1729 dated 13th March 1987 which was certified on 2. 5. 1987. That the said Entry No. 1729 dated 13th March 1987 which was certified on 2. 5. 1987 came to be reviewed by the Deputy Collector, Viramgam Prant exercising suo motu powers on the ground that there is breach of provisions of Bombay Pre











Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top