SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Guj) 138

J.N.BHATT, D.N.PATEL
RAJESH MAHENDRABHAI JOSHI – Appellant
Versus
BHAVNAGAR UNIVERSITY – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.R.Thakkar, HARSHAD A.DAVE, J.R.Nanavati, R.J.OZA, R.M.CHHAYA, S.N.SHELAT

J. N. BHATT, J.

( 1 ) PURSUANT to the consensus, rule was issued and service of which is waived by learned Assistant Government Pleader, Mr. Dave for respondent no. 1, by learned advocate Mr. Chhaya for respondent no. 2, and by learned advocate Mr. Thakkar for respondent no. 3, and in view of the element of urgency involved, consensual request for final hearing is accepted by us and, therefore, we have heard the matter on merits for final judicial adjudication.

( 2 ) A short, but interesting question, at the instance of the petitioner, who is according to him, a duly elected representative of the Bhavnagar Municipal Corporation to the Court of Bhavnagar University and the action of the respondent-authority, in directing repoll, cancelling the election process ended with counting and resultsheet, dated 22. 3. 2004, is raised for reconsideration and adjudication in this writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

( 3 ) THE claim of the petitioner has been that, pursuant to the election programme, he has been one of the candidates for the election for the Bhvnagar Municipal Corporation to the Court of Bhavnagar University, as he is eligible to be elected for the post















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top