SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Guj) 315

SHARAD D.DAVE
JAYRAJSINH TEMUBHA JADEJA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.Y.KOGJE, P.S.CHAUDHARY, S.V.RAJU

SHARAD D. DAVE, J.

( 1 ) RULE. Mr. Kogje, learned APP waives service of rule for the respondent - State.

( 2 ) BY filing this petition, the petitioners have prayed for the direction for quashing and setting aside the judgment and order dated 22. 04. 2004 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge at Gondal in Criminal Revision Application No. 25 of 2004 whereby the learned Additional Sessions Judge partly allowed the Criminal Revision Application preferred by the State.

( 3 ) THE petitioners are the accused who have been arrested in connection with the offence being C. R. No. I 25 of 2004 lodged with Gondal Police Station. The petitioners were arrested on 28. 03. 2004 in connection with the aforestated offence and they were produced before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate at Gondal on 29. 03. 2004. At the time when the petitioners were produced before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, the remand application seeking fourteen days remand of the petitioners was preferred. Learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gondal vide order dated 29. 03. 2004 was pleased to grant two days remand to police custody of the petitioners i. e. till 31. 03. 2004. Further on 31. 03. 2004, the a












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top