SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Guj) 359

C.K.BUCH
SAVITABEN GOVINDBHAI PATEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: ABHAY SINGH, Nandini Joshi, S.V.RAJU

C. K. BUCH, J.

( 1 ) THE present Revision Application has been preferred, against the issuance of notification under section 82 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Code) by the learned metropolitan Magistrate, Court No. 5, Meghaninagar, ahmedabad; directing all the petitioners (orig. accused) of the Criminal Case i. e. M-Case No. 2/03, pending under investigation with the Karanj Police Station of Ahmedabad city, to appear before the said Court; invoking jurisdiction of this Court under Section 401 r/w. Sections 397 and 482 of the Code.

( 2 ) THE learned counsel Mr. S. V. Raju, appearing on behalf of Mr. A. P. Shah, learned counsel for the petitioners-accused, has pointed out the basic infirmities in the notification; that the petitioners are not given 30 exclusive days to surrender and that by itself makes the notification ineffective and invalid and, therefore, no proceedings under Section 82 of the code can be initiated. According to petitioners, the notification under challenge has been issued pursuant to one application dated 16th January, 2004 given by the investigating Officer i. e. the Police Sub-Inspector, pattharkuva Chowky, Ahmedabad. Accor












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top