SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Guj) 466

D.A.MEHTA, M.S.SHAH
Sarojben Wd/o Mangalabhai Somahhai Vagliri – Appellant
Versus
Ramji Mandir Trust – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: Murali N.Devnani, Yalin Soni, YATIN SONI

M. S. SHAH, J.

( 1 ) ). These appeals are directed against common judgment and order dated 4th october, 2001 of the learned Single. judge allowing Special Civil Application nos. 4280 to 4294 of 2001 by which, the learned Single Judge quashed and set aside the common order dated 25th January, 2001 and another order dated 19th March. 2001 passed by the Deputy Collector. Nadiad under Section 23-A of the Bombay Rents, hotel and Lodging House Rules Control act, 1947 [for short "bombay Rent Act"] permitting the appellants to get electricity supply in the premises occupied by the appellants and belonging to the respondents.

( 2 ) ). The facts leading to filing of these appeals are as under :2. 1 The appellants made applications before the Collector under Section 23-A of the Bombay Rent Act staling that the appellants are tenants and occupants of the properties situated at Dakor Taluka thasara being Municipal properties nos. 596, 591, 600, 589, 600/2. 594, 599. 593, 592, 598. 597/1 and 509. The appellants are residing in the above premises for the last more than 60 years. According to the appellants, the respondents Nos. 1 to 3 contended before the Collector that the respondents have not p



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top