J.N.BHATT
PANCHMAHAL DISTRICT PANCHAYAT – Appellant
Versus
SALAMBHAI BAVABHAI PARMAR – Respondent
( 1 ) IN this group of Writ Petitions, common questions about the interpretation of the provisions of Sec. 33c (2) and resultant rights of the employees are involved. Therefore, upon request, they are heard simultaneously, and now, they are being disposed of by this common judgment.
( 2 ) THE petitioners, Panchayats, are bodies duly constituted under the provisions of the Gujarat Panchayats Act, 1993 and constituted in Panchmahal district of Gujarat State, whereas, respondent No. 1 in each petition is the workman or the casual labourer and respondent No. 2 is the Mamlatdar of panchmahal District, being Revenue Recovery Authority. The respondents, in these petitions, filed Recovery Applications under Sec. 33c (2) of the Industrial disputes Act, 1947 ("i. D. Act", for short) against the petitioner-authorities before the Labour Court, Godhra, Panchmahal District, being Recovery application Nos. 3 to 10 of 1995, raising the following pleas : (I) That they are working since 1973 on permanent basis and with honesty and integrity; (II) That they have continuously worked as workmen for more than 240 days continuously for 5 years; (III) That, they are, therefore, entitled to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.