SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Guj) 671

D.N.PATEL
AHMEDABAD ELECTRICITY COMPANY LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
RAMESH D. DEVNANI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: HIREN P.VYAS, P.M.VYAS, PRAFUL N.THAKKAR

D. N. PATEL, J.

( 1 ) THE present petition has been preferred under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, whereby, the petitioner has challenged the order dated in Civil Suit no. 1917 of 2004 passed by the learned Judge, City Civil Court, Ahmedabad, mainly on the ground that the Ahmedabad City Civil Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the civil suit in view of the provisions of the Electricity Act, 2003, especially in view of section 145 thereof and has also prayed to quash and set aside the order below application exh. 15 in Civil Suit no. 1917 of 2004 passed by the Ahmedabad City Civil Court, Ahmedabad.

( 2 ) THE learned counsel for the petitioner mainly submitted that the above civil suit has been preferred by the respondent for a declaration that the action of the petitioner of disconnection of electricity of the respondent (original plaintiff) bearing customer service no. 927337 of Naranpura zone, is illegal, unreasonable and violative of principles of natural justice and for getting a direction against the petitioner for immediate reconnection of electricity connection of the respondent-plaintiff. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner t



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top