SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Guj) 718

RAVI R.TRIPATHI
JAYANTILAL SANUBHAI TAILOR – Appellant
Versus
RALCHEM LTD – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: HASMUKH THAKKAR, RAJESH.P.MANKAD

R. R. TRIPATHI, J.

( 1 ) ON 1st October, 2004, this Court issued Rule, returnable on 20th October, 2004 and in the meantime, directed the Office to pay the amount of Rs. 65,400=00, deposited by the opponent, to the learned Advocate appearing for the applicant by an account payee cheque in the name of the applicant, Jayantilal Sanubhai Tailor, on or before 6th October, 2004. It is reported that this order directing the Office to pay the amount is challenged by filing a Letters Patent Appeal and stay is granted.

( 2 ) MR. R. P. MANKAD, learned Advocate appearing for the applicant, submitted that he is pressing for the relief, prayed for in Clause 6 (B), which reads as under:"be please to direct the respondent herein to comply with the provisions of Section 17b of the ID Act from the date of Award (16-4-2003) and make the payment of last drawn wages to the applicant herein during the pendency of the Special Civil Application No. 15081 of 2003. "mr. Mankad further submitted that the Special Civil Application is already admitted by Order dated 17th October, 2003 and pending the petition, ad interim relief is granted in terms of paragraph-12 (B), which reads as under:"pending admission an








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top