SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Guj) 766

J.N.PATEL
BIJALBHAI BHAGWANBHAI NAKUM, SON NATHABHAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: AMRISH K.PANDYA, Chandarana, KRISHNA U.MISHRA

JAYANT PATEL, J.

( 1 ) RULE. Ms. Chandarana, Ld. AGP waives service of rule for respondents. With the consent of learned advocates for the parties, the matter is taken up for final hearing today.

( 2 ) THE short facts of the case are that the petitioner is holding the land admeasuring 3 acres 10 gunthas at village Rajula. The show cause notice was issued by the Collector, dated 23. 11. 01 to the petitioner for breach of conditions on the ground that the petitioner has used the land for manufacturing of bricks. The petitioner submitted the reply on 3. 12. 2001 and stated that he is an illiterate person and the bricks are made in the land with a view to construct a place for his residence and for keeping the agricultural equipments and also for preserving fertilisers and he also submitted that the bricks are used for such purpose and neither the bricks are sold nor the land is given to anyone else for such purpose. The petitioner has prayed for condonation of such breach, if any. It appears that thereafter on 30. 12. 2002 the Collector, Amreli passed the order on the basis that there is an admission on the part of the petitioner to use the land for nonagricultural purpose and consequ








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top