SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Guj) 780

Gujarat High Court
Judgename :K.A.Puj
K.K.PARMAR - Appellant
Versus
OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR - Respondent
MISC.CIV.APPLN.163 of 2002
Decided On : 12/21/2004

Advocates Appeared: ASHOK L.SHAH

Headnote:

Official Liquidator – Company paid staff in the office of the Official Liquidator on the basis of equal pay and other benefits for equal work as of Central Government Staff and particularly, on the lines suggested in the judgment and order of the Bombay High Court in Misc. Company Application applicants have also prayed for interim direction, during the pendency, formulation and finalisation of scheme to grant monetary benefits as are granted to the Company paid staff of the Official Liquidator, High Court of Bombay under order of the Bombay High Court or as may be deemed fit and proper by this Court – Held, IT is made clear that this order would not fasten any additional liability on the Central Government and no one from the Company paid staff shall be entitled to make any claim against the Central Government on the basis of this order right of absorption under the Scheme of Central Government will not either way, be affected by this order the Court has directed the Official Liquidator to file his detailed report alongwith the Scheme and Report of the Chartered Accountant, there is no need to keep this application pending and all other orders will now be passed on the report of the Official Liquidator –Application is accordingly disposed.

K. A. PUJ, J.

( 1 ) THE applicants who are company paid staff working in the office of the Official Liquidator have taken out this judges summons seeking direction from this Court to the Official Liquidator to frame a scheme for the payment of remuneration and other terms of employment of the applicants and other Company paid staff in the office of the Official Liquidator on the basis of equal pay and other benefits for equal work as of Central Government Staff and particularly, on the lines suggested in the judgment and order of the Bombay High Court dated 26. 04. 1994 in Misc. Company Application No. 24 of 1994. The applicants have also prayed for interim direction, during the pendency, formulation and finalisation of scheme to grant monetary benefits as are granted to the Company paid staff of the Official Liquidator, High Court of Bombay under order dated 18. 08. 2001 of the Bombay High Court or as may be deemed fit and proper by this Court.

( 2 ) HEARD Mr. A. L. Shah, learned advocate appearing for the applicants and the Official Liquidator.

( 3 ) MR. Shah has submitted that the applicants are employed in the office of the Official Liquidator. as company paid staff. There are two types of employees working in the office of the Official Liquidator in various High Courts including the office of the Official Liquidator attached to this Court. One type of employees consists of those employees, who are in the employment as employees of Central Government, Department of Company Affairs. The other set of employees are those persons who are not employees of the Government of India, Department of Company Affairs, but who are employed by the Official Liquidator as special or additional staff to help him in the work of liquidation. He has further submitted that this other set of employees is employed by the Official Liquidator under Rule 308 of the Companies (Court) Rules, 1959. They are known as company paid staff and are not the employees of the Government of India, Department of Company Affairs. The Official Liquidator maintained funds for payment of salary, etc. to this Company Paid Staff. The said fund is maintained by the Official Liquidator from the funds available with him from various Companies in liquidation. Though the applicants are in the employment of the office of the Official Liquidator as Company Paid Staff for last several years and are doing similar work for similar number of hours as that of the regular employees of the Government of India, Department of Company Affairs in the office of the Official Liquidator the salaries/emoluments of the Company Paid Staff is much lower and the conditions of service are much inferior than the salaries and emoluments and conditions of service of the Government of India paid employees in the office of the Official Liquidator.

( 4 ) MR. Shah has further submitted that a Misc. Company Application was filee by one similar Company Paid Staff member in the office of the Official Liquidator attached to the High Court of Bombay, by way of Misc. Company Application No. 24 of 1994. The Bombay High Court vide its order dated 26. 04. 1994 directed the Official Liquidator Bombay to frame a scheme for payment of salaries/emoluments to Company Paid Staff in the Office of the Official Liquidator of the High Court of Bombay. Based on the said directions given by the Bombay High Court vide its order dated 26. 04. 1994, the Official Liquidator of the Bombay High Court filed its report before the Bombay High Court and the Bombay High Court has passed an order on 30. 07. 1999 observing that in the interest of justice and to maintain a fair and reasonable parity with regard to both the Government paid and Company Paid Staff, the Company Paid Staff should be given an ad hoc increase of 40% in their gross salary for the Class III employees and 50% increase on the gross salary for the Class IV employees with effect from 01. 01. 1999. The earlier order of the Bombay High Court dated 26. 04. 1994 in MCA N

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top