SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Guj) 39

B.J.SHETHNA
STATE OF GUJARAT – Appellant
Versus
ASHOKKUMAR SHANTILAL DOSHI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: JAYANT P.BHATT, K.T.DAVE

B. J. SHETHNA, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner-State of Gujarat has challenged in this petition filed under Articles 226 / 227 of the constitution of India the impugned judgment and order dated 7. 12. 1993 passed by the Gujarat Civil Services tribunal, Gandhinagar (for short "the Tribunal") partly allowing the Appeal No. 167/93 filed by the respondent-original appellant before it whereby the learned Tribunal interfered with the order of penalty imposed against the respondent-original appellant and reduced the penalty from dismissal to reducing to a lower stage in time scale of pay which the petitioner was getting on the date of his suspension for a period of 5 years with a direction that he shall not earn any increment of pay during the period of such reduction and with further direction that on the expiry of such period of 5 years the reduction will not have the effect of postponing the further increment of pay.

( 2 ) THE respondent-original appellant had joined service in the Revenue Department on 8. 11. 1965. In 1985 he was deputed as Godown Manager at Dahod in Panchmahals district under Gujarat State Civil Supplies Corporation ltd. There was a joint checking of stock in godown done by r









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top