SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Guj) 94

J.N.PATEL
SANDESH LIMITED. – Appellant
Versus
CHANDULAL JETHALAL JAISWAL – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: GIRISH D.BHATT, HARSHAD J.SHAH

J. N. PATEL, J.

( 1 ) HEARD Mr. S. J. Shahfor the original petitioner, Mr. G. D. Bhatt for respondent No. 2 and Mr. Chandulal Jethalal Jaiswal, the respondent No. 1 in the main petition as well as applicant in Civil Application No. 133/05 who is appearing as party in person. Since the party in person was appearing I have heard him in detail. Main petition is for challenging the order, dated 26. 4. 93 passed by the Press Council of India.

( 2 ) MR. SHAH, at the outset, submitted that the petitioner is desirous to withdraw the petition and therefore permission may be granted to the petitioner to withdraw the petition. Mr. Bhatt, Ld. advocate for the respondent No. 2-Press Council of India has left the matter to the court. Mr. Bhatt submitted that he is supporting the order passed by the Press Council of India, however, for withdrawal of the petition, he leaves the matter to the court.

( 3 ) THE respondent No. 1, Mr. Jaiswal who has also preferred Misc. Civil Application No. 133/05, objected to the permission to be granted to the petitioner to withdraw the petition on the grounds as mentioned in the civil application and in furtherance of the said civil application he has also submitte













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top