SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Guj) 84

DEV KANT TRIVEDI
SAJAL SURESHKUMAR JAIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: ARUN D.OZA, N.D.NANAVATI, S.N.SINHA, V.M.PANCHOLI

DEV KANT TRIVEDI, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner accused has moved this court and filed Revision Application, as he was one of the accused involved in an offence registered vide C. R. No. I-23/04 at naranpura Police Station for the offences under Section 306 etc. of the IPC. It is also the case of the petitioner that he was also arrested by the police in respect of the offence registered vide C. R. No. I-2/04 at sahibaug Police Station for the offences under Sections 376 (2) (g) and 120 (B) of the IPC. The accused was arrested by the police on 15. 1. 2004.

( 2 ) WHILE filing this Revision Application, the petitioner has challenged the order passed by the learned addl. Sessions Judge, Court No. 7, Ahmedabad below application Exh. 4 in Sessions Case No. 239/04 by which the application submitted by the petitioner accused for supply of certified copy of the documents, which had been furnished alongwith the charge-sheet to the applicant, in english or Hindi language at the earliest to enable the petitioner accused to defend his case properly, was rejected. The application was submitted by the prisoner through advocate on 17. 1. 2005 and the learned Presiding judge has rejected the said applicat












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top