Gujarat High Court
Judgename :M.R.Shah
Kanjibhai Dahyabhai Malsattar - Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat - Respondent
S.C.A. 14579 of 2003
Decided On : 03/10/2005
Special Civil Applications – Special Civil Applications filed by petitioners – Petitioners of Special Civil Application filed separate one page petitions, being Special Civil Applications be treated as main Special Civil Application – Article 226 of constitution of India respective petitioners have prayed for an appropriate writ direction or order permanently restraining respondents – Secretary, Department of Town planning and Urban Development, State of Area Development authority from acting upon notices dated are at Annexure k to petition – Petitioners are called upon to vacate from land is occupied by them as the same is part of a wide road under town Planning Scheme has become final under provisions – Town Planning and Urban development Act, 1976 – Held, Contention on behalf of petitioners that due to implementation of Town Planning Scheme land in will be taken away by Area development Authority for purpose of widening of road and that they will have to demolish superstructure petitioners – Purpose of saving their property and superstructure variation is required, is concerned, it is worthwhile to consider judgment of this court in case of reported – Rejecting petition of petitioners affected for purpose of six wide road under – Town Planning Scheme, and when a grievance was made that because of scheme petitioners were to lose his residential house –Violation of fundamental rights learned Single Judge of this Court in case has held that Earthquake had practically destroyed city became absolutely necessary for respondents authorities to make an effort to see that residents of city are rehabilitated as soon as possible and the city is reconstructed in a planned manner – Petitions dismissed.
( 1 ) AS common questions of law and facts arise in the present group of petitions, these Special Civil Applications are being disposed of by this common order. As such the Special Civil Applications No. 18260 of 2003 and 18261 of 2003 are filed by the petitioners who are petitioners No. 2 and 4 of Special Civil Application No. 14579 of 2003 and they have filed separate one page petitions, being Special Civil Applications no. 18260 and 18261 of 2003. Special civil Application No. 14579 of 2003 be treated as main Special Civil Application.
( 2 ) IN the present Special Civil application under Article 226 of the constitution of India, the respective petitioners have prayed for an appropriate writ, direction or order permanently restraining the respondents No. 1 and 2, i. e. , Secretary, Department of Town planning and Urban Development, State of gujarat, and Anjar Area Development authority from acting upon the notices dated 2/3-10-2003 which are at Annexure k to the petition by which the petitioners are called upon to vacate from the land which is occupied by them as the same is part of a six metre wide road under the town Planning Scheme No. 4 which has become final under the provisions of The gujarat Town Planning and Urban development Act, 1976 [hereinafter referred to as "the Act"].
( 3 ) DURING the course of hearing of the present Special Civil Applications, and after learned advocate appearing for the petitioners was heard at length for a considerable time, the learned advocate appearing for the petitioners had submitted draft Amendment and requested to allow them to amend the main Special Civil application by adding Paras 6. 5, 6. 6 and prayer clause in terms of Paras 10aa and 10bb by which now the petitioners have prayed for a declaration that they are lessees and occupants of the properties bearing Municipal Nos. 9/913, 9/915, 916, 9/912 and 9/911 and in occupation of the land in Ward No. 9 in the area known as sarsar Gate Area, Anjar, Kutch under the town Planning Scheme concerned in capacity of owners of the structures/ buildings/shops thereon and are entitled to allotment of final plot and payment of compensation under the town planning scheme and that they are the holders of the property entitled to be treated as so entitled under the provisions of the Act and a further prayer is sought for requiring the respondents to propose appropriate variation in the town planning scheme insofar as it relates to properties in question so as to recognise the rights of the petitioners as owners or occupiers under the Act.
( 4 ) IT is the case of petitioner No. 1 that he is the lessee of the land occupied by him of respondent No. 3, Anjar Municipality of 336 sq. ft. since 1980 and he has constructed superstructure on the land in question which has been given Municipal property No. 9/913. "it is the case of petitioner No. 2 of special Civil Application No. 14579 of 2003 and petitioner of Special Civil application No. 18260 of 2003 that he is the lessee of respondent No. 3 Municipality of the land admeasuring 20 x 30 ft. since many years and he has put up superstructures which are given Municipal nos. 9/915 and 9/916. ""it is the case of petitioner No. 3, Lalji balji Soratia that he is the lessee of respondent No. 3 Anjar Municipality of the land upon which he has put up superstructure which bears Municipal No. 9/912. ""it is the case of petitioner No. 4 of special Civil Application No. 14579 of 2003 and petitioner of Special Civil application No. 18261 of 2003 that she is the lessee of the land occupied by her of respondent No. 3 Anjar Municipality and that upon which she has put up shop admeasuring 24 x 14 feet and is running a flour mill which bears Municipal No. 9/ 911. ""thus, it is the case of the respective petitioners and contention on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners were the lessees of the land belonging to and owned by the respondent No. 3 Anjar Municipality upon which they have put up superst
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.