SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Guj) 185

JAYANT PATEL
Rajeshbhai Thakorbhai Bhatt – Appellant
Versus
Director Of Municipalities – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: J.A.ADESHARA, Jirga D.JHAVERI, M.R.MENGDEY, P.Y.DIVYESHVAR, PRADIP PATEL, YATIN SONI

JAYANT PATEL, J.

( 1 ) AS all the matters are interconnected on facts and as the common questions arise, they are being considered by this common judgment finally today, with the consent of the learned Counsel for the parties.

( 2 ) SPECIAL Civil Application No. 10477 of 2003 is preferred by one Rajesh thakorbhai Bhatt claiming to be a contractor who has been authorised to make construction. The short facts are that the borsad Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "municipality") wanted to make construction of 36 shops and as per the petitioner, plinth level construction was made by the Municipality and thereafter the additional construction was to be made but the Municipality was- in shortage of funds and, therefore, the offers were invited from the public at large and offer of the petitioner was ultimately accepted for construction of 36 shops. It is the case of the petitioner that he has paid Rs. 17 lac to the Municipality towards the construction of the shops upto plinth level plus Rs. 15 lac were paid to the municipality for permitting construction, in all Rs. 32 lac. It appears that thereafter on 16. 9. 1999, the proposal was submitted to the municipality for allow

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top