SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Guj) 189

K.M.MEHTA
NATWARLAL PITAMBARDAR PATEL – Appellant
Versus
A. B. TRIVEDI – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.D.OZA, B.S.PATEL, CHIRAG B.PATEL, D.PANDEY, P.K.JANIKIRAN, S.K.JHAVERI

K. M. MEHTA, J.

( 1 ) NATWARLAL Pitambardas Patel, petitioner, has filed this petition with a prayer that this Court may issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order, or direction quashing and setting aside the order passed by respondent No. 1 dated 25. 11. 2004, rejecting the nomination paper of the petitioner as per the proceedings at Annexure-A to the petition and direct respondent No. 1 i. e. Election Officer and Deputy collector to declare the petitioner as elected Chairman of respondent No. 2 bank i. e. Mehsana District Central co-operative Bank Ltd. , Mehsana. 1. 1 the petition was filed on 29. 11. 2004. This Court (Coram: Jayant Patel, J) issued notice on 2. 12. 2004. Pursuant to the said notice on behalf of respondent No. 1 Mr. A. D. Oza, learned Government Pleader appears. Mr. S. K. Jhaveri, learned sr. advocate, appears on behalf of respondent No. 2 and Mr. P. K. Jani, learned advocate, appears on behalf of respondent No. 3 i. e. Shri Nitinbhai Ratilal Patel. On the joint request of the learned counsel for the parties, I have taken up the matter for hearing. Hence Rule. The learned counsel for the respondents waive service of Rule.

( 2 ) THE facts giving









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top