SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Guj) 266

C.K.BUCH
CHANDAN PANALAL JAISWAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.D.OZA, A.D.SHAH, SAURIN A.SHAH

C. K. BUCH, J.

( 1 ) HEARD ld. Counsel Mr. AD Shah for the petitioners and ld. PP Mr. AD Oza for the State.

( 2 ) INVOKING jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 R/w Article 21 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners -original accused of two difference offences registered as (i) I. CR No. 2/2004 by Shahibagh Police Station, Ahmedabad and, (ii) I. CR No. 23/2004, by Naranpura Police Station, have prayed to handover the investigation of the said crime to respondent No. 5 Central Bureau of Investigation, Gandhinagar, alleging that the investigating agency of both the crimes have failed in carrying out investigation objectively and some unfairness is also shown towards the accused persons during investigation, and collecting the evidence. It is further prayed that respondent No. 5 CBI be directed to ascertain genuineness and authenticity about the plea of "alibi" raised by the petitioners accused from the beginning before the Investigating Officer and after carrying out the investigation into the said aspect and to submit is report to the concerned criminal court. Anticipating the favourable result, the petitioners have also prayed that they should be exonerated from both th























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top