SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Guj) 254

K.A.PUJ
PATEL KASHIRAM GANGARAM – Appellant
Versus
UNICURE REMEDIES PVT. LTD. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.S.VAKIL, RAJENDRA K.GOLANI

K. A. PUJ, J.

( 1 ) ALL these petitions are filed by the petitioning Creditors under Section 433 (e) read with Section 434 of the Companies Act, 1956 for winding up of the respondent Company.

( 2 ) ON 14. 03. 2001, this Court has admitted all these petitions. However, publication of advertisement was deferred till 28. 03. 2001. The Court has observed that on that day i. e. on 28. 03. 2001, the learned advocate for the respondent Company shall come forward with the instructions regarding deferment of the publication. When all these matters were taken up for hearing regarding publication of advertisement on 16. 10. 2001, this Court has passed further order regarding advertisement and the petitions were ordered to be advertised in local daily Newspapers "indian Express" English and "jansatta" - Gujarati that final hearing was fixed on 29. 11. 2001. Advertisement in the Official Gazette was dispensed with.

( 3 ) BEING aggrieved by the said order, the respondent Company carried the matter in appeal before the Division Bench of this Court and by common order dated 18. 01. 2002 in O. J. Appeal Nos. 39 to 46 of 2001, the Division Bench of this Court permitted the respondent Company to withd




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top