JAYANT PATEL
JHAVERBHAI SAVJIBHAI PATEL, THROUGH P. O. A. HOLDER – Appellant
Versus
KANCHANBEN NATHUBHAI PATEL – Respondent
( 1 ) LEAVE to delete Respondent No. 7 from Special Civil Application No. 8559/2005.
( 2 ) WITH the consent of the parties, both the matters are taken up for final hearing today and as in both the petitions there are more or less common issues and common challenge, they are being considered together by this common order.
( 3 ) RULE. Mr. A. J. Patel, learned Counsel appears for the private respondents and waives service of notice of Rule. Mr. Mengdey, learned AGP appears for State authorities and waives service of notice of Rule for respondent authorities.
( 4 ) UPON hearing the learned Counsel appearing for the parties, it appears that the common question arise for consideration of the Court is as to whether the entry mutated on the basis of the registered sale deed could have been ordered to be cancelled by the authority in toto or the authority ought to have allowed the revenue entry to be continued with the qualification and clarification that the same would be subject to the outcome of the proceedings of civil suit which is pending before the concerned competent court.
( 5 ) AS such it appears that there is no dispute on the point of the factual aspects regardin
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.