SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Guj) 341

C.K.BUCH
NITINBHAI MATHURDAS THAKKAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: ASHISH H.SHAH, ASHISH M.DAGLI

C. K. BUCH, J.

( 1 ) HEARD learned counsel appearing for the parties and Ms. N. V. Joshi, ld. APP, appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.

( 2 ) RULE. The formal service of Rule is waived by ms. N. V. Joshi, ld. APP, on behalf of the respondent no. 1 and Mr. A. H. Shah for respondent no. 2. The Rule is fixed forthwith on consent.

( 3 ) INVOKING jurisdiction of this Court, the petitioners have approached this Court for quashing the complaint being Criminal Inquiry Case No. 299 of 2004 and the order dated 1st September, 2004, passed in Criminal inquiry Case No. 299 of 2004, by the ld. Chief Judicial magistrate, Rajkot, for the offences punishable under section 406, 420 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code.

( 4 ) IT is submitted jointly by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as orig. complainant that the parties are not interested in a detailed reasoned order as they have compounded the matter out of the Court and agreed to see that all the litigations comes to an end. The Court is informed that the parties have decided to separate from the matrimonial ties and they have executed a Deed of Divorce on 3rd May, 2005. Both the parties have signed the same and a notar





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top