SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Guj) 486

RAVI R.TRIPATHI
MANIBEN WD/o NARANJI KASANJI THROUGH POWER OF ATTOR HOLDER – Appellant
Versus
NAGIN LAKHA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: J.B.PARDIWALA, JITENDRA M.PATEL

RAVI R. TRIPATHI, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner is before this Court through a Power of attorney Holder challenging the order passed by the mamlatdar and ALT in Tenancy Case No. 32f/3913/77 dated 29. 01. 1986 which was confirmed in appeal by the Deputy collector, Valsad in Tenancy Appeal No. 688 of 1986 by judgement and order dated 18. 12. 1987 against which a revision Application being No. TEN. B. S. 29/88 was preferred before the Gujarat Revenue Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as The Tribunal) which too came to be rejected by the judgment and order dated 08. 03. 1991. The petitioner filed a review application against the said judgement and order of the Tribunal being Review Application No. TEN. C. S. 3/91, which came to be rejected by an order dated 05. 01. 1995. The petitioner has prayed in para 12 as under. 12. The petitioner having no other adequate remedy approaches Your Lordships and prays that a writ of certiorari and/ or mandamus be issued under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India: (A) to quash and set aside the order of the and A. L. T. Dated 29. 1. 86 at Annex. e and the order of the Dy. Collector dated 18. 12. 87 at Annex. f and the order of the Gujarat revenue





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top