SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Guj) 519

C.K.BUCH
DHIRENDRA NATVARLAL SANGHPAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: J.R.DAVE, M.C.Sood

( 1 ) THE present Group of Revision Applications are preferred by different petitioners accused against the common order of rejection of an application praying discharge under section 227 of Crpc by ld. Addl. Sessions Judge, Court No. 8, City Sessions Court, Ahmedabad dated 08. 09. 2004 in Sessions Case No. 178/2004. The petitioners of all the Revision Applications are shown as an accused in the crime registered with Meghaninagar Police Station being CR. No. I. 26/2004 for the offences punishable under various sections of Indian Penal code. Petitioner of Cri. Rev. Application No. 655/2004 Dhirendra Natwarlal Sanghpal -original accused No. 2 has preferred application exh. 7 praying discharge. Similarly, the petitioner of Cri. Revision Application No. 656/2004 Kanubhai Ramjibhai Solanki- original accused No. 3 has preferred application exh. 6 praying discharge and petitioner of Cri. Revision Application No. 657/2004 -original accused No. 1 has preferred application exh. 6 praying discharge. All of them have prayed that they should be discharged from the offence punishable under section 397 of IPC. Ld. Counsel Mr. JR Dave appears for the petitioner of Cri. Rev. Application No. 655/200




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top