SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Guj) 561

P.B.MAJMUDAR
SANJAY RAMESHCHANDRA SHAH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.D.OZA, P.R.NANAVATI, PRADIP PATEL

P. B. MAJMUDAR, J.

( 1 ) THE applicant, who has duped and cheated so many innocent persons, has approached this Court once again, by way of filing this application, praying to release him on bail during the pendency of the trial. Initially, this Court had released the applicant on bail. However, since it was found that he has committed breach of the conditions, the bail was cancelled, and he was taken into custody. Thereafter he has approached this Court again by filing the present application

( 2 ) FACTS leading to the present application are as under: 2. 1 A complaint has been filed against the applicant- accused, which is registered as FIR No. 232 of 2004 before the Satellite Police Station, Ahmedabad City. The said complaint has been filed by one Naranbhai and 23 others under section 420, 114, 120. B, 467, 471 and 468 of the Indian Penal Code. The complainants have booked residential flats which was to be constructed by the applicant-accused. The accused had constructed various towers, known as Nandanvan-IV Scheme. The complainants have booked their flats in i Tower, and had paid considerable amount towards earnest money. Subsequently, the complainants realised that the accused























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top