SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Guj) 646

B.J.SHETHNA, M.C.PATEL
M. JAGDAMBA DYEING and PRINTING – Appellant
Versus
RAMKUMAR RAMCHAL MISHRA C/o. SURAT SILK LABOUR UNION – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: K.R.KOSHTI, S.J.GAEKWAD

B. J. SHETHNA, J.

( 1 ) THE appellants have challenged, in this Appeal, the Judgment and order dated 1. 12. 2004, passed by the learned Single Judge (Coram : Akil Kureshi, J.) in Special Civil Application No. 7430 of 2004 whereby the learned Single Judge allowed the writ petition i. e. Special Civil Application No. 7430 of 2004 filed by the respondent workman and quashed and set aside the impugned orders dated 22. 5. 2003 and 5. 4. 2004 (Annexure : C) passed by the Labour Court.

( 2 ) THE respondent workman was working as Bleaching Machine man in the Dyeing Department of the appellant Company with effect from 1. 1. 1995 on a monthly salary of Rs. 2210/ -. But, the respondent was not given his Card, salary slip, etc. When demanded the appellants terminated his service by oral termination order dated 6. 7. 1991 without following the provision of law. Though, the workman wrote a letter dated 2. 8. 1997 to take him back in service he was not taken in service by the appellant. He, therefore, filed T. Application No. 712 of 1997 on 3. 10. 1997 before the Labour Court. Summonses issued in it were duly served on the present appellants employer. Though served, the appellants did not bother t





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top