SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Guj) 650

M.R.SHAH
GUJARAT PIPAVAV PORT LTD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: B.S.PATEL, M.B.Parikh, P.R.NANAVATI

( 1 ) IN this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for an appropriate writ, order or direction directing the respondent authorities more particularly, the respondent No. 2-Collector, Amreli to allot land admeasuring 30-Acres of survey No. 109 of village Rampara-II, Taluka Rajula, District Amreli. It is also further prayed to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction restraining the respondent No. 2-Collector, Amreli from allotting or in any manner transferring or alienating land admeasuring 30-Acres of survey No. 109, village Rampara-II, Taluka Rajula, District Amreli to any other person/s save and except the petitioner company.

( 2 ) IT is the contention on behalf of the petitioner that the Gujarat Maritime Board was constituted by the Government of Gujarat under the provisions of the Gujarat Maritime Board Act, 1981 and the said Board has been vested with the power to develop, manage, administer and control intermediate and minor ports in the State of Gujarat. It is also further averred in the petition that somewhere in the year, 1985 the Gujarat Maritime Board decided to develop an intermediate port at Pipavav and therefore, sent














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top