SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Guj) 687

C.K.BUCH
PUSHPABEN CHAMPAKLAL SHAH (LOKHANDWALA) – Appellant
Versus
RIKHAVDEV TIRTHRAM SHARMA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: KASHYAP R.JOSHI, P.K.HANDA

C. K. BUCH, J.

( 1 ) HEARD Mr. K. R. Joshi, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Ms. Renuka Gaur, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. P. K. Handa for the respondents. Rule. The formal service of Rule is waived by Ms. Renuka Gaur on behalf of the respondents. The Rule is fixed forthwith on consent.

( 2 ) THE present petition is moved under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by the petitioners-orig. plaintiffs making grievance against the order passed by the ld. Civil Judge (J. D.), Ankleshwar, whereby the petitioners-orig. plaintiffs are directed to step into the witness-box as witnesses of the defendants and that too before the respondents-orig. defendants examination to disprove the case of the petitioners and to prove the contentions raised by the respondents-defendants in the written statement.

( 3 ) THE complication cropped up in the proceedings of Regular Civil Suit No. 10 of 1992 when the plaintiffs decided to lead evidence through their power of attorney holder. Undisputedly, there is a detailed cross-examination of Shri Ajay Ramlal, power of attorney holder of the plaintiffs and the contention of the defendants is that only with a view to prove cert








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top