SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Guj) 713

BHAWANI SINGH, H.K.RATHOD
MANOHAR MADHUKAR TAMBE – Appellant
Versus
BHAGUBHAI LILADHAR – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: AMRISH K.PANDYA, ARUN H.MEHTA, D.R.BHATT, N.S.TAHILRAMANI

BHAWANI SINGH, CJ.

( 1 ) BOTH the appeals [first Appeal No. 647 of 1989-Manohar Madhukar Tambe vs. Bhagubhai Liladhar and others and First Appeal No. 648 of 1989-Gitaben Vasudev Chugla and others vs. Bhagubhai Liladhar and others] are proposed to be decided by this judgment, since they arise out of the same accident and common award passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Valsad at Navsari, in M. A. C. Petition No. 345 of 1985 and M. A. C. Petition No. 351 of 1985 dated 01. 11. 1988.

( 2 ) SHORTLY stated, accident took place on 05. 02. 1985 at about 12. 30 p. m. near village Adada. Vasudev Chugla (deceased) and pillion rider Manohar Madhukar Tambe going on motor cycle no. GTN 8418 were hit by truck no. GTO 3098 coming from opposite side. As a result of the accident, Vasudev Chugla died and Manohar Madhukar Tambe suffered serious injuries. The truck was driven by Bhagubhai Liladhar (opponent-1) owned by Vinodkumar Durlabhbhai Patel (opponent-2) and insured with The Oriental Insurance Company Limited (opponent-3 ). Consequently, minor Manohar Madhukar Tambe filed claim petition for Rs. 50,000/- and legal heirs of Vasudev Chugla claimed compensation of Rs. 4,00,000/ -.

( 3 ) IN













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top