SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Guj) 741

ANIL R.DAVE, R.M.DOSHIT
PATEL GOVINDBHAI AMBARAM – Appellant
Versus
SPL. LAQ OFFICER – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: A.J.PATEL, Ajay R.Mehta, VIPUL PANCHOLI

ANIL R. DAVE, J.

( 1 ) THIS group of Appeals arise from the common judgment and awards dated 8th August, 2001 passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge [sd], Mehsana in Land Reference Nos. 129 of 1988 to 133 of 1998. The appellants are the claimants in Land Acquisition Case Nos. 512 of 1988/m.

( 2 ) THE appellants are the residents of village Adaraj, Taluka-Kadi, District Mehsana. The claimants owned pieces of land at village Adaraj. The said pieces of land were temporarily acquired under Section 35 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 [hereinafter referred to as, ?the Act?] for exploration by the Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited [hereinafter referred to as, ?the Corporation?], the acquiring body. For such temporary acquisition, by Award dated 25th August, 1989, the Land Acquisition Officer awarded annual rent of Rs. 110/= per Are. As the appellants were dissatisfied with the compensation awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer, the above referred References were made under Section 35 (3) of the Act.

( 3 ) THE said References have been decided by the impugned judgment and awards. The learned Civil Judge has determined the market value of the acquired lands considering its fertilit










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top