SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Guj) 778

K.A.PUJ
SAURASHTRA UNIVERSITY – Appellant
Versus
SHAMBHUBHAI HIRJIBHAI PADALIA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: ANOOP KRISHNAN, MURLI DEVNANI, YOGESH S.LAKHANI

( 1 ) THE petitioner-Saurashtra University has filed this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India praying for quashing and setting aside the award passed by the Labour Court, Rajkot in Reference (LCR) No. 2043 of 1988 on 20th July, 1996, whereby the Labour Court has directed the petitioner to reinstate the respondent with continuity of service and full back wages.

( 2 ) THE case of the petitioner is that the respondent joined the petitioner-University as a Cook-cum-Attendant vide Office Order dated 25th June, 1985 for a period of one year on probation. During the course of period of probation, though the performance of the respondent as a Cook-cum- Attendant was not satisfactory and upto the mark, only with a view to afford him a chance to improve, his probation period was subsequently extended for a period of three months and as per the extension letter, the respondents tenure as probationer was to come to an end on 30th September, 1986. It is also the case of the petitioner that even after the extension of his probation period of three months, the performance of his duties was not found satisfactory and upto the mark. Hence, as per the conditions of his a









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top