SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Guj) 834

H.B.ANTANI, J.M.PANCHAL
NAVINKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: DEVANG T.SHAH, JAYESH DAVE, K.T.DAVE

H. B. ANTANI, J.

( 1 ) PRESENT appeal filed under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, questions legality of judgment dated January 19, 2000, rendered by the learned Special Judge and Additional Sessions Judge, Mehsana Camp at Patan, in special N. D. P. S. Case No. 2 of 1999, by which the appellant is convicted under sections 15, 20, 21 and 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 ("the Act" for short) and sentenced to suffer R. I. for ten years and fine of rs. 1 Lakh, in default, S. I. for three years, for each of the offences.

( 2 ) THE short facts giving rise to the present appeal are as under : mr. Dashrathsinh Joravarsinh Vaghela, Police Sub-Inspector, Rapid Response Cell, gandhinagar, received an information on 8. 10. 1998 that person named Navinkumar alias Shambhuprasad alias Shambhu-maharaj Chimanlal Vyas, residing at Rangfali rudra Mahalay, near Rudra Mahalay Sidhpur, was dealing in ganja/charas etc. On receipt of the information, he reduced the same into writing. He went to Sidhpur rest House and requisitioned services of two panch witnesses and returned to sidhpur Police Station. The first part of panchnama was drawn at Sidhpur R










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top