SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Guj) 805

K.A.PUJ
MM SHETH – Appellant
Versus
AMC – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: PRASHANT G.DESAI, SHAILESH C.PARIKH

K. A. PUJ, J.

( 1 ) THE petitioner has filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for declaration that the decision of the Standing Committee of the respondent Corporation to terminate the services of the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary, unreasonable and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and further praying for quashing and setting aside the same. The petitioner has also prayed for reinstatement in service with full back wages and with all other consequential benefits.

( 2 ) THIS petition was admitted on 27. 03. 1985. It was decided by this Court on 18. 10. 1996 whereby the petition was dismissed. The said dismissal order was challenged by the petitioner in L. P. A. No. 870 of 1997 on the ground that the said order was passed without hearing the petitioner. The Division Bench of this Court has, therefore, allowed the appeal and quashed and set aside the order passed by the Learned Single Judge after hearing Mr. Shailesh Parikh for the appellant and Mr. Prashant G. Desai for the respondent - Corporation. The Division Bench has directed the office to place the matter before the Learned Single Judge and also made it clear that




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top