SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Guj) 267

M.R.SHAH
OUTDOOR ADVERTISING OWNERS ASSOCIATION AHMEDABAD – Appellant
Versus
K. KAILASHNATH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: DIPAN DESAI, R.R.MARSHAL, T.S.NANAVATI

M. R. SHAH, J.

( 1 ) AS common question of law and facts arise in this group of petitions, they are being disposed of by this common judgment and order. The Special Civil Application No. 1610 of 2006 is treated as main matter.

( 2 ) SPECIAL Civil Application No. 1610 of 2006 is filed by Outdoor Advertising owners Association and rest of the Special civil Applications are filed by individual members of the said Association who are in the business of outdoor advertising in the shape of placing of hoardings and signage in and around the city of Ahmedabad as well as within the area of AUDA. By way of these petitions under Article 226 of the constitution of India, the respective petitioners have prayed for an appropriate writ, direction or order declaring the action of the respondents No. 1 to 4 namely, AUDA and its Officers in indulging into demolition of hoardings of the members of the aforesaid association and the respective petitioners as being bad in law, illegal, unconstitutional, arbitrary and consequently to restrain the respondents from indulging into any highhanded action of demolition of hoardings in AUDA are without following due process of law and without communication of o













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top