SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Guj) 523

H.K.RATHOD
DISTRICT PANCHAYAT – Appellant
Versus
BABUBHAI LAKHABHAI CHUDASMA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: P.V.Hathi

H. K. RATHOD, J.

( 1 ) HEARD the learned Advocate, mr. P. V. Hathi, appearing on behalf of petitioner.

( 2 ) IN the present petition, the petitioner has challenged the award passed by industrial Tribunal, Rajkot in Reference no. 83 of 1995 dated 18. 1. 2006, whereby the Industrial Tribunal has directed to the petitioner to implement the Government resolution dated 17. 10. 1988 w. e. f. 1. 10. 1988 unless and until the service of respondent workman will regularize after obtaining the permissions from the State government.

( 3 ) LEARNED Advocate, Mr. Hathi, submitted that terms of reference is to make permanent Shri Babubhai Lakhabhai chudasma, Shri Devraj Puna Vaja and shri Kachara Sidi Alam after completion of 240 days in service and also to grant all the benefits which are available to permanent 2 employee with arrears. He also submitted that Industrial Tribunal has no jurisdiction to grant the benefit under Government resolution dated 17. 10. 1988 because there is no terms of reference which referred for adjudication. He also submitted that industrial Tribunal has jurisdiction only to examine or adjudicate the dispute which has been referred for it. Except that, the industrial Tr






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top