SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Guj) 485

M.S.SHAH, K.M.MEHTA
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
RUKHSHANABEN SALIMBHAI VORA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: MEHUL SHARAD SHAH

M. S. SHAH, J.

( 1 ) THIS appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 challenges the judgment and award dated 11. 11. 2005 of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Nadiad in MAC Petition No. 395 of 2004 whereby the Tribunal awarded compensation of Rs. 1,54,500/- together with interest and costs to respondent No. 1 herein, the mother of the minor girl aged 7 years who died in a motor vehicles accident.

( 2 ) THE deceased was being carried on a motor cycle of her father on 20. 12. 2004. When the father was riding the motor cycle with the deceased, a kite was being flown and the kite thread on the road slit the neck of the minor girl. The girl was removed to the hospital where she succumbed to the injuries.

( 3 ) MR Mehul Sharad Shah, learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that the accident cannot be said to have taken place on account of involvement of a motor vehicle. If at all the claimants had any cause of action, it would be against the person who was flying the kite. Alternatively, it is submitted that the deceased was a pillion rider and, therefore, her risk was not covered. Strong reliance has been placed upon the decision of the Apex Court in United India




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top