D.N.PATEL
MEHUL KISHORSINH JADEJA – Appellant
Versus
AMARJIT SINGH (I. A. S. )APPELLATE AUTHORITY AND COMMISSIONER OF HEALTH – Respondent
( 1 ) RULE. Learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr. K. L. Pandya waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 3. Learned Counsel Mr. Shalin Mehta waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent No. 2. This petition has been preferred against the order dated 19th May, 2006 passed by Authorisation Committee as well as against the order dated 21st July, 2006 passed by Appellate Authority, which are at Annexures "e" and "g" respectively to the memo of the petition.
( 2 ) LEARNED Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the present petitioner was examined by Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital and report given by the doctor, to the effect that the petitioner requires kidney transplantation. The kidney of the petitioner was not working properly, and therefore, the petitioner had applied to get kidney from one Vijaykumar Dilipbhai Choksi, who out of love and affection towards the petitioner is ready to donate the kidney to the petitioner and for that application has been preferred under Sec. 9 of the Transplantation of Human Organs Act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act, 1994" ). It is stated by the learned Counsel for the petition
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.