SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Guj) 824

D.N.PATEL
MEHUL KISHORSINH JADEJA – Appellant
Versus
AMARJIT SINGH (I. A. S. )APPELLATE AUTHORITY AND COMMISSIONER OF HEALTH – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: I.H.SYED, K.L.PANDYA, SHALIN N.MEHTA

D. N. PATEL, J.

( 1 ) RULE. Learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr. K. L. Pandya waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 and 3. Learned Counsel Mr. Shalin Mehta waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of respondent No. 2. This petition has been preferred against the order dated 19th May, 2006 passed by Authorisation Committee as well as against the order dated 21st July, 2006 passed by Appellate Authority, which are at Annexures "e" and "g" respectively to the memo of the petition.

( 2 ) LEARNED Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the present petitioner was examined by Muljibhai Patel Urological Hospital and report given by the doctor, to the effect that the petitioner requires kidney transplantation. The kidney of the petitioner was not working properly, and therefore, the petitioner had applied to get kidney from one Vijaykumar Dilipbhai Choksi, who out of love and affection towards the petitioner is ready to donate the kidney to the petitioner and for that application has been preferred under Sec. 9 of the Transplantation of Human Organs Act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act, 1994" ). It is stated by the learned Counsel for the petition
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top