SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2006 Supreme(Guj) 807

A.M.KAPADIA, K.A.PUJ
SAIYED SALIM SAIYED HUSSAIN SAIYED – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT – Respondent


Advocates Appeared: K.T.DAVE, M.H.M.SHAIKH

A. M. KAPADIA, J.

( 1 ) THE appellant ( the accused for short) was tried by the learned Additional City Sessions Judge, Court No. 13, City Sessions Court, Ahmedabad in Sessions Case No. 255 of 1999 for commission of the offences punishable under Section 8 (c) read with Sections 21 and 29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 ( ndps Act for short), arraigned on the charge of having found with contraband article charas weighing 257 grams, without pass or permit, when he was intercepted and apprehended near Lal Mills Cross Roads, adjacent to SRP Point, Gomtipur, on the basis of the prior information received by P. W. 1, Ravindrakumar Kashiram Bhatt, Senior Police Inspector. At the end of the trial, the accused was found guilty of the offences with which he was charged and as his complicity is proved, the learned Judge of the trial Court convicted him vide judgment and order dated 5. 5. 2000 for commission of the offences punishable under sections 8 (c) read with Sections 21 and 29 of the NDPS Act and sentenced him to suffer R. I. for ten years and fine of Rs. 1 lakh i. d. , R. I. for further period of one year. Aggrieved by the aforesaid judgment and order of con


















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top